tantek.com

In reply to:

https://twitter.com/innovati/status/941536128846397440

https://twitter.com/FullStack_Jimmy/status/941620006470782977

https://twitter.com/jensimmons/status/941686691013722115


@innovati @jensimmons @FullStack_Jimmy @ZeeCoder @keithjgrant @firefox @mozilla @paulhhowells @rachelandrew @brkemper appreciate links, updated proposal!

RICG waiting on requirements proposal from March? https://github.com/ResponsiveImagesCG/cq-usecases/issues/36#issuecomment-287917442 cc @wilto @beep

Important step (before syntax arguments) to capture both broader use-cases and implementation constraints. cc @davidbaron

And as far as “have the ears of the browser makers”, several on this thread work at browser makers.

I’m seeing high interest, but this needs more active community participation (like back & forth interactions), perhaps some wrangling.

on (ttk.me t4rv1) using BBEdit