↪ In reply to Tantek’s noteLack of (or insufficient) self-advocacy can be a form of self-obstruction, seeing doors as locked when they are unlocked, or self-sabotage, misperceiving self-worth, not speaking up, understating self-worth.
Such harms may spill into shared works and relationships, under-advocacy and under-appreciation of partners, friends, teammates, co-workers, communities.
These connections can work both ways. Advocacy strengthening advocacy. Worth to worth.
Time away was good. Calmness, perspectives, insights:
1 I need to self-advocate more 2 More sight into the yoga teacher / student relationship 3 Listening, respecting, respecting choices & wishes 4 Talkers vs. listeners, their dynamic, few that balance both
↪ In reply to Tantek’s noteDespite not checking FB (always a good start), I’ve found it takes a while (at least a day?) to stop feeling compelled to check, keep up with, or “work on” whatever projects (job related or not) are top of mind. Email, Slack, etc.
20 years ago today, having only seen a brief trailer but convinced it was going be a big deal, I took my team working on the #Tasmanengine for @Microsoft #IE5Mac to the opening day of #TheMatrix at AMC Mercado 20. @sfalken@jimmyg #Matrix #1999_090
Ran up Mt Tam in rain today. Twice. ~17.8 miles, 5300+' climbed. First #solotam. First #doubletam. I got knocked down, but I got up again. Twice.
1 Started with @BryanTing(📷) 2 Temelpa trailhead 3 #SF #skyline still visible under the cloud cover 4 First Tam ascent done! 5 Clouds blocking the scenic view at Tam East Peak 6 Second Tam ascent done in horizontal rain! 7 Finished with Bryan Ting(📷)
Ask me about fallen trees at headheight across trails, and how slippery wet flat rocks can be.
↪ In reply to Tantek’s noteSummary: 01:42 suspended per Twitter email: "abusive behavior" and "targeted harassment of someone" 18:36 restored per "account got caught up in one of these spam groups by mistake"
My tweets are pretty boring. Running pics. #IndieWeb #CSS
One comparing Twitter to the Matrix about an abstract “someone”. Does Twitter’s automated system think “harassment of someone” literally means referring to the literal text “someone”? Is one offhand tweet considered “harassment”?
#trailtuesdaythrowback to 13.2+ miles and ~2500' last #Saturday at #SFRC. Clear blue skies, a stark contrast from the previous week’s cold rain!
1 Gravel steps up Miwok 2 Hills and the Pacific from Miwok 3 Miwok looking back towards Tennessee Valley 4 Dias Ridge looking west to the Pacific 5 Muir Beach 6 Up Coastal Trail looking south to Pirates Cove 7 Looking down Fox Trail towards the #SF #skyline 8 Coastal Fire Road winding downhill
🌳 Easy 10km #run in #GoldenGatePark on re-opened #trails for #Sunday #runday #funday! #fromwhereIrun #trailrun #California #SF #SanFrancisco #optoutside #nofilter
1 freshly re-opened #GGP trails 2 #running around Stow lake 3 up Strawberry Hill 4 Huntington Falls 5 blooming #flowers by the boathouse 6 Phil Arnold #Trail / Oak Woodlands trailhead on the Bay Area Ridge Trail, just off the Eastern JFK entrance to Golden Gate Park.
↪ In reply to a comment on issue 27 of GitHub project “arewedistributedyet”https://github.com/lgrahl, by “which umbrella organisation”, which organizations do you think are setup / intended to handle incubation efforts that are not yet ready for standardization? Or do you think there is already something that has been incubated that is ready for standardization? If so, could you link to what in particular and where it was incubated?
You also referenced W3C’s paid membership model. Note that W3C Community Groups (which this is a proposal for) are open to all (anyone may participate) and without fee (no membership is required) per https://www.w3.org/community/about/
The existing W3C CG WICG https://www.w3.org/community/wicg/ has a fairly good track record for incubating proposals in their GitHub repos which then either graduate to a working group (some have gone to W3C, others to WHATWG), or incubation stalls/fails as a result of discovering an area or proposal is unworkable or lacks market interest etc.
Are there other incubation-friendly/centric organizations that you think would be a better home for a dweb/p2p incubation group than a W3C CG?
↪ In reply to @schofeld’s tweet@h2vx@schofeld thanks for your patience. https://h2vx.com/ updated (from dev.h2vx version) with support for #HTML5 elements: article aside figure footer header hgroup mark meter nav progress section time #h2vx to-do: time datetime attribute
The webmention.io /api endpoints accept a 'target' query parameter which currently must be an absolute URL. This proposal extends the 'target' query parameter to also accept a protocol relative URL (i.e. starting with "//") and return all mentions of that target with any protocol (e.g. both 'http:' and 'https:').
Use-case: this will allow sites which have migrated from http to https, or which still serve both http and https and accept webmentions for both, to easily query webmention.io for all mentions to either http/https versions of their permalinks, to show webmentions regardless of which protocol was used in their webmention target URLs.
Test-case: http://tantek.com/2019/065/e1/homebrew-website-club-sf is live with an iframe that embeds a display of RSVP webmentions via a service using a protocol relative URL in the target param to a webmention.io api call. Check both of these:
And you should see at least one RSVP displayed in the bottom from v2.jacky.wtf, likely with a green checkmark ✅. Here’s a direct link to just the RSVP display for that post but hardcoded to 'http:' mentions only: v2.jacky.wtf RSVP.