> Should we just close this issue then?
No, because this issue as named is to “integrate” which is still a pending task separate from the Team task of “updated proposal”.
> just a reminder to the Team to keep things in sync as needed
No, that is missing half the point of this issue. By “in both directions” (per issue description) I believe it means that the chair/editor of the Vision have explicit work to do in the direction of incorporating content into the Vision document.
I disagree with “Candidate to Close” and do not think it needs AB time to discuss closing at this time, thus am removing that label.
If you believe this issue needs explicit sync-discussion by the AB at this time, please add “Agenda+” instead with your goals for discussion.