tantek.com

t

  1. What are the things on your bucketlist that being a billionaire would make no difference?

    When I was in Berlin at the end of last month, I was chatting with my pal Mo, and noted a sticker I’d seen that said “ELON MUSK DIDN’T GET INTO BERGHAIN” with a QR code that linked to: https://berlinguide.de/money-cant-buy-you-love-the-story-behind-elon-musks-berghain-rejection/

    Mo has been to Berghain, and I shared that especially after hearing that a billionaire was rejected, I put it on my list: go clubbing at Berghain.

    Having completed my responsibilities for July (hosting the W3C Advisory Board at Mozilla Berlin), I started to focus on my next big goal, finishing (or attempting to finish) a 50k that Sunday (3 days from then).

    I realized those two goals had something in common: being a billionaire makes no difference to achieving them. Being a billionaire won’t help you achieve them.

    You can’t buy your way into Berghain, you have to show up with an authentic vibe that feels right to the bouncers.

    You can’t pay someone to do the work of running a 50k, you have to personally train consistently, train hard, show up, and run it yourself. Or any other race distance.

    I told her these two things inspired me to come up with the idea of:

    The anti-billionaire bucketlist (I’d prefer a better, positively framed phrase)

    And filtered my prior goals accordingly.

    She said I should post about it.

    At the time I had only a few things in mind:
    * Run the Skyline 50k (August 3rd)
    * Get into Berghain
    * Finish a 50 mile race
    * Finish a 100km race

    I checked that first one off (https://tantek.com/2025/216/t1/finished-skyline50k-ultra — still writing up my race report) and am reflecting on others.

    What’s on your anti-billionaire bucketlist?

    on
  2. Fall virtual-only AC meeting inconsistent with W3C Process

    on

    As requested by an Advisory Board (AB) member, I am filing an issue for consideration by the AB. The upcoming Advisory Committee (AC) meeting, that is normally part of the annual TPAC week, is currently scheduled to be a virtual-only Advisory Committee session before TPAC week. This seems inconsistent with the W3C Process requirement for a face-to-face AC meeting twice a year.

    The face-to-face AC Meeting at TPAC is a key reason for AC Representatives (AC reps) to go to TPAC in-person, both for the AC Meeting itself and the opportunity to meet and interact directly with other AC reps, during the meeting, e.g. to discuss raising issues or asking questions during Q&A, and after the meeting for informal chats about the overall state of W3C, the most pressing issues, what collective actions the AC may wish to pursue or provide feedback or requests to the AB.

    A virtual-only meeting provides no such easy opportunities for direct informal interactions among AC reps or between AC reps and members of the AB, which are usually one of the most valuable aspects of a face-to-face AC meeting.

    By removing the face-to-face AC Meeting from TPAC week, one of the key (for many, the primary) reason(s) for traveling to TPAC is/are removed, and thus makes it hard (or harder) for at least some AC reps to justify the time and travel to TPAC, despite all the secondary and additional benefits of participating in TPAC in-person.

    Thank you for considering this issue, and how to best drive a resolution.

    on
  3. 👍

    on
  4. 👍

    on
  5. 👍

    on
  6. 👍

    on
  7. Finished the #Skyline50k #trailRace in 9:34:51 yesterday! My 3rd best 50k, and first 50k in over two years since the Marin Ultra Challenge 50k in 2023.

    It was quite the journey to get back here, and a lot went well in this race. From training to preparing and planning, the temperate cool weather for most of the day, and executing perhaps the best I have in a race.

    For now, I am very happy with my performance in this #Skyline race, and want to express my thanks to Scena Performance (@scenaperformance.com @ScenaPerform) for putting on such a welcoming, friendly, and supportive event.

    Lots more thoughts and feelings to share.

    Strava: https://www.strava.com/activities/15336739842/overview

    Previously: https://tantek.com/2022/289/t1/hot-skyline50k-ultra-finish

    #run #trailRun #trailRunning #ultraRunning #trailRunner #ultraRunner #50k #50kTrailRace #50kFinish #50kFinisher #ultraMarathon #2025_215 #20250803

    on
  8. The Vision for W3C has been officially published as a ratified W3C Statement: https://www.w3.org/TR/2025/STMT-w3c-vision-20250729/

    As one of the editors, along with Chris Wilson (@cwilso.com @cdub@mastodon.social), I’m both proud of this multi-year W3C Advisory Board (AB) effort, and grateful to everyone who contributed and gave feedback that helped improve the document.

    Writing down and openly publishing our collective values and principles is an important step forward for W3C. We now have a shared reference to both guide our priorities and cite to help resolve differences in opinion (rather than having to appeal to authority).

    The AB (@w3.org/wiki/AB @ab@w3c.social) has prioritized work on the Vision project for many years (https://www.w3.org/wiki/AB/Vision), and personally, co-leading this project during my time on the AB has been inspiring, challenging, and a source of many lessons learned. Lots more to share on all that. For now, happy to take a moment to celebrate this milestone.

    #w3cVision #VisionForW3C #WorldWideWeb #W3C (@w3.org @w3c@w3c.social) #w3cAB #Vision #VisionTF
    #openWeb #webStandards

    Previously:
    * https://tantek.com/2025/100/t1/vision-for-w3c-please-vote

    More posts:
    * https://www.w3.org/news/2025/vision-for-w3c-is-a-w3c-statement/
    * https://www.w3.org/blog/2025/vision-for-w3c-a-manifesto-for-our-operations-and-decision-making/

    on
  9. Support new status W3C Statement for W3C Vision

    on

    The W3C Vision Statement needs explicit support from Bikeshed to be rendered properly as a W3C Statement. This is a specific sub-issue of Support the new statuses of the W3C Note track from P2021 and P2023 #2584 that I am requesting be prioritized.

    I made a number of fixes/improvements to Bikeshed in an attempt to add W3C Statement support, namely for Status: STATEMENT:

    However, these do not seem to have been sufficient to get Bikeshed to render the Editor’s draft of the W3C Vision as a W3C Statement.

    I need help to make further progress with this issue.

    In the mean time, I may try manually adding the W3C Statement stylesheet and bits of prose to the W3C Vision get something ready to publish.

    on