Thanks for the heads-up Sam (@gsnedders); sent me down quite a rabbithole!
While reading More Than Two, I did notice some imbalances, e.g. male-author centering bias, but wow.
Reading your link + these posts first, then re-reading MT2 with them in mind:
* https://brighterthansunflowers.com/2019/09/02/thoughts-on-the-fifth-anniversary-of-more-than-two/
* https://medium.com/@kalital/my-life-belongs-to-me-reading-the-polyamory-narratives-of-franklin-veaux-against-the-84be142aa8a1
* https://www.dawnserra.com/ep261/
* https://polyamory-metoo.com/
* https://www.theferrett.com/2014/11/19/every-piece-of-advice-given-unleashes-a-demon/
* https://polyamory-metoo.com/celeste-metoo-story/
I’ll add more as I find them and read more. Updated original post to point to this one too.
There is a bunch of stuff in the Fragmention specification, e.g. the '##' stuff, that doesn't relate to the current proposal that should be moved to an appendix like Historical, or Alternatives considered. Such an appendix should be clearly separate so that it’s easier to tell which parts of the spec are necessary for current publishers and consuming code implementers, which are optional (if any), and which are purely informative background.
t